Showing posts with label women and girls in Saudi Arabia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women and girls in Saudi Arabia. Show all posts

Monday, 23 September 2013

Saudi Arabia: Has tide turned on women’s rights?

Source: Gulf News

  Has the tide turned on the Saudi government’s stand on the issue of women driving? As the only country in the world I know of that denies women the right to drive, has the thinking that governs the powers to be moved towards the lifting of an age-old embargo?
It would seem so, considering that one major hurdle has been lifted by recent statements from none other than the president of the Saudi religious police, who recently stated publicly that “the ban on women driving is not mandated by any text in the Sharia”.
Shaikh Abdul Latif Al Shaikh, President of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (the religious police) said that Sharia, the Islamic legal code which is the basis for much of the kingdom’s laws, “does not have a text forbidding women driving”.
This is good news for many Saudis and residents alike, frustrated by the ban on women driving. The religious police has long been considered one of the staunchest bastions of opposition when it comes to women’s issues and female empowerment, and many of its members have claimed that driving is a “path to vice and social degradation”.
Hardliners took it upon themselves to flash the religion card without any authenticated backing to their dismissive claims against progressive initiatives. With the Al Shaikh stating that it is not for his organisation to mandate the law, but simply to uphold it, the ball is back in the government’s court.
In the kingdom, an unnatural culture of dependency coupled with built-in frustration has evolved as a result of the influx of millions of expatriate male drivers, many who get behind the wheel for the first time in their host country.
Add to that the social and cultural disparity as a result of this large group of unskilled expatriates that reside in practically every home, and social development takes a back seat.
In the same week, the Saudi Ministry of Education rejected calls by religious men to call off sports classes in private girls’ schools. This contentious issue was something that ran along the same lines as the driving ban, as hardliners had asserted on many occasions in the past that sports for girls would be detrimental to their honour, their virginity, and would contribute to their moral decadence.
In this latest instance, a vigilante force of some 30 men claiming to uphold and spread virtue and prevent vice, marched to the ministry and demanded from officials to cancel sports classes in the schools based on their arguments. In their view, any activity that demanded that girls participate in sports was totally un-Islamic.
Education Minister Prince Faisal Bin Abdullah had earlier taken a different view. He was firm in his directive that all education authorities in the kingdom initiate the steps necessary “that would enable girls to practice sports in their schools in a manner that would conform to Islamic teachings while improving their physical fitness”.
Moderate Saudis see a significant shift behind such actions. Many could not understand why driving or indulging in sports by women was considered a sin. But to go against the religion card is not a frivolous matter. And the dread of being accused of apostasy kept many voices muzzled.
Whereas in the past, the demands of hardliners was almost considered a law into itself, in recent years there has been a dramatic shift towards a more tolerant position of acceptance of all things obviously not detrimental or conflicting with the teachings of Islam. Such a shift also signals a separation of the often veiled cultural traditions that were deeply intertwined with Islam, making it difficult to separate one from the other.
Urban-dwellers who had long advocated a more accepting approach towards the empowerment of women had in recent decades been deluged into submission by the cultural traditions of the rural populace, who as they made their shift towards urban centres in search of jobs also began to force upon the rest of society their own traditions and beliefs. Many of them had even joined the various branches of government service including the ministry of education and resisted changes from within.
But in recent times, the forces for progress have begun to grab back the initiative. In drafting law after law, the kingdom is making itself transparent in that it is no longer content to be held back by the whims of hardliners who would like nothing better than to subjugate women and push us all back into the stone age.
A few years ago, King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz had said: “I believe strongly in the rights of women ... my mother is a woman, my sister is a woman, my daughter is a woman, and my wife is a woman. I believe the day will come when women drive. In fact, if you look at the areas in Saudi Arabia, the deserts and in the rural areas, you will find that women do drive. The issue will require patience. In time, I believe it will be possible. Yes, I believe we can. But it will require a little bit of time ... Our people are just now beginning to open up to the world, and I believe that with the passing of days in the future everything is possible.”
Many Saudis would say today that the time has finally arrived.

Tariq A. Al Maeena is a Saudi socio-political commentator. He lives in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/@talmaeena

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

Saudi Princess says men are too afraid to allow women's rights

The advancement of women’s rights in Saudi Arabia is being held back because of fear among conservative men, Saudi Arabia’s Princess Ameerah al-Taweel has said during a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum in Jordan.
Princess Ameerah, who is married to high profile Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, said it was difficult to change the mindset of people within Saudi Arabia, which has one of the worst levels of female participation in society in the world.
“The most daunting challenge is not only the legislation but it is the concept, the mentality [of Saudis] because we know our society is very conservative and is very private and it’s very difficult to change concepts in Saudi Arabia to support women in the work place or to have a larger contribution [in society],” Princess Ameerah said.
“Many conservative men say ‘we don’t want women to work, we want her to maintain her dignity’. That’s not true [that] she’s not maintaining her dignity while working.
“So I think the main reason is fear from women and not for women, because they are afraid of women. We know what women are stronger than men in our society because they’re a minority and the minority usually wants to prove itself.”
While a member of the audience during a separate WEF session on the Arab employment crisis, Princess Ameerah challenged Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) CEO Mohammed Al Mady to explain why his company had not “opened the door” to Saudi women.
Al Mady defended the company by saying it had employed 50 women, but the audience laughed when it was revealed SABIC had 20,000 employees.
“We have been slow for sure,” Al Mady conceded.
“That was not really by design that we want to be against women or anything, but we want to get the best practice done in Saudi Arabia because there are many mistakes that have happened and it really gives bad names for the employees and the employers.
“Now we’re in a position to get the best practices and do it in our company and you will see a big change.”
The government has announced several programs to help women enter the workforce for the first time in recent years and last year more than 160,000 Saudi women were employed – a record.
However, Princess Ameerah said 85 percent of those unemployed were female.
She said many women were unaware of the wide opportunities available to them. A significant percentage of female graduates who intended to enter the workforce wanted to be in the education sector, while only a handful sought careers in information technology and the finance sector.
“There is a concept that men should work and be the breadwinners and women should stay at home and care for the children. If you want to demand real equality then women must contribute to build the society equally with men, if they want real equality just like the societies in the West.
“So women should not only care for their homes and their children but they should also contribute to their societies and their countries. This is important for us; such concepts should change.”
Princess Ameerah said even she had been criticised for her role in society by people she was close to and worked with.
She said there needed to be more Arab women’s networks where they could support each other.
“If you don’t have a circle of people who are living through this with you, if you do not believe in what you are doing you will not make it, you will not continue working and you will not continuing facing those criticisms,” she said.
“Unfortunately we don’t celebrate great success stories in the region. We have amazing women who have accomplished many things in the public sector [and] in the private sector … [and] those are the role models for women talking about breaking the glass ceiling.

“As far as I’m concerned not every woman should work but every woman who wants to work should be able to work.”

Source: http://www.arabianbusiness.com/saudi-princess-says-men-are-too-afraid-allow-women-s-rights-503045.html#.UaMpbW1t1v4

Saturday, 18 May 2013

SAUDI ARABIA - PUNISHMENT OF MEN OVER WOMAN'S CONVERSION TO CHRISTIANITY


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/christian-conversion-saudi-arabia-_n_3272441.html

May 13 2013 - RIYADH (Reuters) - A court in Saudi Arabia has sentenced two men to lashes and prison terms for converting a woman to Christianity and helping her flee the conservative Islamic kingdom, the Saudi Gazette reported on Monday.
A Lebanese man was sentenced to six years in prison and 300 lashes for converting the woman, while a Saudi man was sentenced to two years and 200 lashes for aiding her escape abroad, the English-language daily said. It added that the pair had challenged the verdict and would appeal.
A spokesman at the justice ministry could not immediately be reached for comment.
In Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, it is against the law for Muslims to abandon their faith, a practice known as apostasy. Proselytising for other religions or practising them openly is also illegal.
Judges have considerable leeway in how to interpret the kingdom's Sharia code of Islamic law and are not bound by sentencing guidelines or a system of precedent. Both capital and corporal punishment are legal.
The case emerged last year after the woman's family complained that she had been "brainwashed" by colleagues at the insurance company where she worked and that they had helped her leave Saudi Arabia via Bahrain on false documents.
The woman, whose name has not been released, was granted asylum in Sweden last year, the newspaper reported.
Last year King Abdullah, who has promoted limited reforms since coming to the throne in 2005, opened a centre for religious dialogue in Vienna that drew criticism because of Saudi Arabia's own lack of religious freedom. In 2008 he sponsored an inter-faith conference in Spain.
(Reporting By Angus McDowall, Editing by William Maclean and Alistair Lyon)

Friday, 17 May 2013

Campaign Against Women in Saudi Arabia




A foundation of social care in Saudi Arabia is on a very serious campaign to promote non-violence in the household. The campaign aims to show concern for local authorities on women. The campaign comes amid strict regulations and restrictions on women in Saudi Arabia. Ranging from being prohibited to drive a car, and then being required to be accompanied by a man when out of the house, until obliged to cover the entire body with a burka.

As reported by news.com.au, Monday (29/04/2013), the campaign promoted by the foundation and the King Khalid Foundation is named 'No More Abuse'. The photo is very interesting ad campaign, which is a Saudi Arabian woman wearing a veil to cover her face and her body Though veiled, but at the woman's eye looks swollen and bruised.

"Some things can not be covered - fighting together women's abuse, according to an ad campaign tagline on this. In a written statement, said that the campaign aims to help women in upholding justice. Therefore, it is common knowledge that cases of violence against women or domestic violence rife befall women in Saudi. "The phenomenon of violence against women in Saudi Arabia is actually larger than appears on the surface. Phenomenon of this kind are found in darkness. We want to help uphold justice for all women and children who are victims of violence in the kingdom," read the ad description the.

In the 2012 report, noted that Saudi Arabia is at position 131 among 134 countries in terms of gender equality. Women tend to be underestimated by men in this country. Violence against women was widespread in Saudi Arabia.
  
Source : http://news.detik.com/read/2013/04/29/163448/2233247/1148/kampanye-antikekerasan-di-arab-saudi-beberapa-hal-tak-bisa-ditutupi

Bella Nabilla

Monday, 13 May 2013

"In the Land of Invisible Women"


Dr. Qanta Ahmed, the author of In the Land of Invisible Women wrote about the plight of women in Saudi, describing it as a case of abject sexism. Though most people are wont to believe that it has much to do with Islam, it truly isn’t. Islam as a religion does NOT advocate disrespect or discrimination of women – it is its interpretation by certain segments of society that leads to the continued prevalence of discrimination. Warlords and tribal communities embraced Islam in some of the earlier centuries. Despite embracing their religion, they allowed their culture to prevail in some sort of a bridled confluence with religion.

For instance, The Quran does not encourage Polygamy. It reads thus: "If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice." This verse is said to have been revealed in the aftermath of a war, when there were too many widows and orphaned children that needed support and protection. But look at how this is being interpreted by those who don’t look at the Quran in the right way.

Among the many countries in the Islamic realm, Saudi Arabia stands tall as the country with the most hardliner stance that prevails in the society and political milieu against women. The country banned driving rights for women which was a move that was protested against in a great show of strength and courage, by Manal al-Sharif. What’s more, Saudi Arabia by law mandates that women are required to have a male guardian. They cannot vote, or stand for elections, though it appears that there is hope for change, in that King Abdullah has promised voting rights in the 2015 elections. Coupled with this are mandatory veiling and employment restrictions, educational restrictions and plenty of issues concerning marriage and rights over children and property. Though a dissected rendition of the legal system as it stands might be the right way to study the system, a cursory perusal itself is enough to reveal the overarching theme: that women are not given equal rights before the law. 

Wednesday, 6 March 2013

Women in Saudi Arabia


Although the majority of countries would agree that the violation of any human right is unjust, Women’s Rights tend to have a long and controversial history globally. Despite claims of male and female equality, the global arena has an extensive patriarchal history; within which women were, and in some cases still are, banned from voting, owning property, working, divorce and other systematic rights. While women’s rights have developed in a number of ways in the West, substantial progress still needs to be made in many parts of the world. Though, significant strides have been made globally to ensure women’s rights, the Middle East remains, in the world’s eyes a violator and opponent of women’s rights. Today, Saudi Arabia in particular is under scrutiny for their treatment of women. Some of the most divisive and hotly debated restrictions on women are prohibition on driving, the requirement of male guardianship, lack of political empowerment and economic opportunity. An exploration of the current status of women in Saudi Arabia demographically in terms of economically and educationally, the status of female rights politically as well as an exploration of the Saudi Arabian religious take on woman’s rights in comparison to the Qur’anic Scripture, will allow a better understanding of the circumstances and factors behind the laws enforced on women as well as the reactions of citizens.

The Female Demographic: Employment and the Economy
The current female population in Saudi Arabia, as determined by the 2011 consensus, is 11, 780804, and a male dominant population of 14,323899 with a small difference of 2,543095 (Central Intelligence Agency, 2011). Similar to population, the gender gap in Saudi Arabia remains relatively small or average in comparison to the rest of the world, with the largest gap in the employment and literacy fields. 54.2% of women in Saudi Arabia are employed in comparison to 76.4% of men, of course in regards to this data it must be mentioned that the median age of the population remains 23 years old for women and 26 years old for men (Central Intelligence Agency, 2011); the importance of this latter piece of data may allow a presumption of the rarity of youth employment. This 22.2% gap could be a result of various factors such as opportunity, cultural priority, economic job availability and industry domination. The major industry of Saudi Arabia remains exportation of petroleum. “The petroleum sector accounts for roughly 75 per cent of budget revenues, 45 per cent of gross domestic product, and 90 per cent of export earnings. Apart from petroleum, the Kingdom’s other natural resources include natural gas, iron ore, gold, and copper” (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, 2011). In 2009, the World Bank ranked the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the 13th most competitive economy worldwide. The major reforms taken to achieve these results include further female integration in the economy as well as more entrepreneurial encouragement reforms underway in the Kingdom. Saudi Arabia boasts a difference of ranking number 67th in 2004 to number 13 in a matter of 4.5 years; this difference is attributed to the series of economic reforms that continue to take place to further promote the economy (Reuters, 2009).
The Female Demographic: Education
Of course, in comparison there remains an almost 14% gap in literacy rates of men versus women. With a male literacy rate of 84.7% in contrast to the female rate of 70.8%; here it must be mentioned that there is no new data on literacy rates and thus these numbers exist from the Central Intelligence Agency study conducted in 2003(Central Intelligence Agency, 2003). In 2005, King Abdullah bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud took the place of his half-brother King Fahd on the throne upon King Fahd’s death in 2005. Since then, the King has made a series of reforms politically, socially, economically (as stated above) and educationally. The King has made significant progress in the past 6 years, with a focus on all fields. His endeavors to increase female educational opportunities in order to bridge the 14% gap presented in 2003 are as follows “In September 2009, he inaugurated the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), a graduate-level research institution and Saudi Arabia’s first co-educational university… In September 2011, King Abdullah opened the 60,000-student Princess Nora bint Abdulrahman University, the largest all-female university in the world” (United States Department of State, 2011). Samar Fatany, a female journalist at Arab News, a daily newspaper in Jeddah explains, “The national dialogue that has started, debating issues that were tabooed in the past; scholarship programs that send so many of our students abroad to be also exposed to other cultures. As a result, the educated elite, the intellectuals or the minority of progressive thinkers have a great role to play in order to influence change and allow our young people to be the engines for a better future” (Arrott, 2011).
While the process of reforms for females is not up to par with Western progress, the reforms in multiple fields over the last 6 years are nevertheless a rapid development. Basmah Omair, director of the al Sayeda Khadija bin Khawlid Center at the Jeddah Chamber of Commerce says “In recent years, you have seen women take leadership positions like the deputy of the ministry of education and vice mayor of Jeddah… So it's not something [new], but maybe the media is concentrating [on these events] now” (Arrott, 2011).The purpose of the following data is to build a factual picture around the female demographic and current reforms to allow a better understanding of the existing state of women in Saudi Arabia.
Politics: Female Restrictions and their Promised Future
Presently, the main political restrictions women in Saudi Arabia face are their inability to vote or participate in the political arena. Women remained unable to vote through past monarch decisions because of claims of religion and culture. When King Abdullah announced late September last year that women would be allowed to vote and run for office in 2015, much of the Western reaction included production of headlines such as “Saudi Women To Vote Without Male Approval”, “Women not able to Vote and Run for Municipal Elections until 2015”, and “First Step Toward Moving Country into the Modern World Not Nearly Enough”. The King announced in his speech “Because we refuse to marginalize women in society in all roles that comply with sharia, we have decided, after deliberation with our senior ulama (clerics)[1] and others... to involve women in the Shura Council as members, starting from the next term”(Canadian Broadcasting Corporation News, 2011).  
In contrast to Western response, much of Saudi Arabia rejoiced, with women in particular. Fatany exclaimed of the announcement, “It is a very, very positive step,” she said. “It gives us hope [and] really encourages us to work harder for women to assert themselves and to be part of the decision-making process” (Arrott, 2011). The Saudi population recognizes the challenges associated with such a change given cultural and societal values. Nimah Ismail Nawwab, an internationally recognized Saudi poet who writes about Saudi society, said “We have been working for over 20 years toward many things, including the right of women to vote. We expect that the change will take its time because it's not just a political matter, it's a societal matter at the end of the day” (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation News, 2011).  Of course, such a change would require a few years to implement so as to accommodate the cultural and religious beliefs of gender segregation while allowing for female empowerment. While the King continues to enforce a majority of reforms that continue to advance Saudi Arabia positively, most of the population is optimistic and understanding of the effectiveness of the reforms coupled with the culture that society abides by. Like any other nation, changes are able to occur through gradual reformations or circumstances of politics, health, economy or the fast-paced revolutions that have occurred worldwide historically.
Female Oppression: Hijabs, Burqas and Veils
            The most popular topic under Islamic rule and Women’s Rights are the commandments of Hijab. Hijab is the prescribed Islamic lifestyle of a woman conveying modesty by covering her head as well as the rest of her body except for her feet, hands and face[2]. The Hijab has proven to be controversial in most of Europe, spurring the niqab ban in France, the Canadian province of Quebec and possibly the Netherlands who claim that the Hijab is an oppressive garment and a symbol of Women’s Rights violations (Bowen, 2007). Most responses to these bans and claims of oppression resulted in defensive assertions from the Muslim countries, feeling as if the Western notions were intrusions on a lifestyle they do not understand. In Saudi Arabia, Jawhar claimed “[People] lose sight of the bigger issues like jobs and education. That’s the issue of women’s rights, not the meaningless things like passing legislation in France or Quebec to ban the burqa ... like Saudis should modernize and join the 21st century or that Saudi women need to be free of the veil and abaya ... And by freeing Saudi women, the West really means they want us to be just like them, running around in short skirts, nightclubbing and abandoning our religion and culture” (Wagner, 2010). Much like the ban put forth in France, here the Hijab becomes the agent of socialization for gaining the identity of a Saudi Muslim woman
            In Saudi Arabia, women are required to wear and abaya, Hijab and a niqab, the abaya is a loose garment worn on top of clothing; the Hijab in this case refers to the head covering while a niqab refers to the veil. Both abaya and the veil are not Islamic commandments but a method to achieve modesty, the concept of Hijab can also be achieved through a loose shirt and skirt for example. Today, most women leave out Hijab as a part of Women’s Rights. “Time and again, the women I met in Jeddah and Riyadh insisted how women dressed was not the priority, that reform in Saudi Arabia was about other things” (Kendall, 2006). Most Saudi Arabian Women continue to press on that they want to wear the veil and that Hijab is part of their lifestyle, that it is fashionable, comfortable, convenient and makes them feel safe (Kendall, 2006). Ultimately, no matter the defense or offense, the Hijab becomes a garment of choice just like the religion it is prescribed by. To either force a man or a woman to wear or not wear a garment through which he or she expresses his or her freedom and feels secure is another violation of human rights. As a friend explained “You would never ask a Queen to take off her Crown, so why would I take off my Hijab?”.
Female Oppression: Islamic Interpretation and Perspective in Saudi Arabia
            The Western fears of too much Islam are not echoed by most of the Middle East and South Asia. Given the Renaissance and Age of Enlightenment it is easy to see why most of the West holds the doctrine of separation of church from state, or in other words religion from law is necessary (Kamguian, 2003). However, the same preconditions do not exist for the majority of the world; various global historical and cultural factors attribute various outcomes and circumstances. As an Islamic country, Saudi Arabia’s legal system is based on Sharia law (Islamic Law). However, because the law is mostly unwritten in terms of detailed, modern political, economic and social procedures, legislatures and conducts; strict interpretations on what would, could or should be done to abide by Islamic beliefs can vary greatly. A journalist who chose not to expose her name asserted that clerics often abuse rights using Islam as a defense but doing so is unjust to the religion, “If the Qur’an does not address the subject, then the clerics will err on the side of caution and make it haram[3]” (Wagner, 2010). Most Saudi women do not see Islam as the obstacle to women’s rights.
In fact, most men and women call for a better use of Qur’an, the Islamic religious scripture in order to enforce Women’s Rights. Islam teaches that men and women are equal before God. It grants women divinely sanctioned inheritance, property, social and marriage rights, including the right to reject the terms of a proposal and to initiate divorce (Public Broadcasting Service, 2002). The outcry on the misuse of religion for political purposes is again reverberated by Kareem Elbayar, a JD/MA international affairs candidate at The George Washington University Law School, and a Middle East/North Africa Specialist at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law; he claims “Many of the Medieval holdings that are now enshrined in Islamic law—especially with regard to women—are outdated and even blatantly incorrect misapplications of the law (in the same way that virtually all Western jurists would now argue that the holding in Dred Scott v. Sandford was incorrect)” (Elbayar, 2010).
In adherence to Islam, Saudi Arabia would be required to follow the laws of the Qur’an closely using the scripture as guidance; it would also have to turn to Hadith. Hadith are the quotations of the Prophet Muhammad[4]. Sabria Jawhar, a prominent female journalist of the Saudi Gazzette claims, “If all women were given the rights the Qur’an guarantees us, and not be supplanted by tribal customs, then the issue of whether Saudi women have equal rights would be reduced” (Wagner, 2010). If the former, is the case than the country should have never adapted any law that would deem women inferior. For example, the Prophet[5] is reported to have said “You have rights over your women, and your women have rights over you” (Public Broadcasting Service, 2002). One of the Prophet Muhammad’s[6] many great accomplishments was the establishment of Women’s Rights in the 7th century. During the 7th century women did not have rights, even the right to life was not guaranteed. In reality, the burial of infant girls was a common practice, in times were girls were held as the useless sex as well as in time of scarcity. “In the Qur'an, it is said that on Judgment Day "buried girls" will rise out of their graves and ask for what crime they were killed. Part of Muhammad's legacy was to end infanticide and establish explicit rights for women” (Public Broadcasting Service, 2002).
Overall while the world complains that reform is slow, and may not be up to par with western progress, many factors must be considered, the population, culture, history, religious background, political circumstances, economic situation and values of each country must be considered. These factors establish the priorities of a country, within which some factors such as economy, politics, foreign policy and health may rank first. Considering this, the rapid expansion of multiple sectors in Saudi Arabia including Women’s Rights must be applauded. While such comparisons come easily through a call for human rights, it must be understood that not all countries or people are made the same and as such there is no formula for how and when human rights become enforced. While a positive effort is being made with regards to Women’s Rights, other Western interpretations are not yet welcome, a portrayal of the balance of ensuring rights and respecting cultures. Nevertheless, this is the very purpose of Anthropological study, to better understand these factors which may aid in a country’s unique establishment of rights through dialogue, accommodation and/or policy reforms.

By Yasmeen Husain
 yf_husain@hotmail.com 



[1] Generally Islamic scholars, who provide their own interpretations of Hadith and Qur’an.
[2] “And say to the believing women to lower their gazes, and to guard their private parts, and not to display their beauty (zeenah) except what is apparent of it, and to extend their headcoverings (khimars) to cover their bosoms (jaybs), and not to display their beauty except to their husbands, or their fathers, or their husband's fathers, or their sons, or their husband's sons, or their brothers, or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their womenfolk, or what their right hands rule (slaves), or the followers from the men who do not feel sexual desire, or the small children to whom the nakedness of women is not apparent, and not to strike their feet (on the ground) so as to make known what they hide of their adornments. And turn in repentance to Allah together, O you believers, in order that you are successful.” (Surat-un-Nur: 31).
[3] Religiously impermissible, Forbidden.
[4] Peace Be Upon Him.
[5] Peace Be Upon Him.
[6] Peace Be Upon Him.

Sunday, 27 January 2013

Beheading in Saudi Arabia


It certainly is astonishing to learn about such a practice but it is indeed true, particularly in a country whose legal system supports this.  Saudi Arabia’s law to behead a criminal who has been convicted and found guilty is criticized by the international world.  In fact, the recent incident had the UN highlighting how it does not endorse this law in any way.  Other organizations namely, Amnesty International have voiced their oppositional stance on this law.  In recent news a female was found and convicted of killing the very child she was supposed to care for as a maid in Saudi Arabia.  
 
So we get the picture that this government appears to be going to inhumane lengths but at what point do we stop to ask ourselves the underlying cause? I think the issue isn’t the victim but why she was made a criminal in a country foreign to her.  It seems to me that the matter is more than the mere beheading of someone.  In order to judge we need to be fair and unfortunately the law in many countries is far from that. 

 
The criminal whose name was Rizana Nafeek, was of Sri Lankan decent.  Her crime is that she was found guilty of killing an infant and for that she was beheaded according to the law of the country she was working in.  It may seem unfair but regardless of what nationality one is the law in a country one works or resides in is the binding law.  So some may think that I agree with her sentence but that’s not true, I disagree with this law because I don’t see it being the best method of penalizing someone legally but whose not to say that our method for example in the U.S. where we put people in prison on a life sentence is any different.  What is any different than a life in which one isn’t living, but merely motioning day by day until the last second the last breathe they have is in the confounds of a cellar. 

 
The real underlying issue is that this female lied to leave her country, about her age mainly in order to find work and make herself a better life.  It’s terrible that this tragedy happened and that she was the victim of this rather harsh Saudi Arabian law but the root of the cause and why she was in a foreign country is because of her own accord.  Her own country, Sri Lanka’s inability to find out that she had committed fraud to leave out of the country (by documenting that she wasn’t a minor) and their inability to provide or help those citizens in need, that is the cause.  For a minor to feel that she has to take the weight on her shoulder to provide for herself and assist her family back home is a scenario that several impoverished women face.  Her soul weighs heavily on all females everywhere, on those of us that struggle day by day to make ends meet and those of us that meet a rather bleak ending. 

 
Thoughts go out to her family in prayer.

By: Juliet Abdeljawad

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Ignorance is bliss! Really?



Many media articles state that women in Saudi Arabia are treated as perpetual children, ignorant and removed from the world outside. If they would like to travel, work, open a bank account, marry or divorce, they require written consent of a male relative, who can be anyone from a father to a son. While we are fighting for equal participation of women in organisations in many parts of the world, it’s shocking to imagine places where there is no participation of women in few of the most basic functions of life such as driving. Imagine having to take the permission and company of a male member to do simple tasks, like going to the market or a clinic, or worse having your son as your guardian if your father and husband are not around.
Apparently Saudi law is based on Sharia and tribal customs, where purdah (segregation of   women and men) and namus (honour) are integral. This fusion of two ideologies creates a much tougher law against women, ignoring the gender equality based elements in Islamic law as well (Human Rights Watch Report, 2008)[1]. The male members of the family are supposed to protect the namus, and can even punish a woman to death if she causes harm to it. In 2007, a woman was murdered by her father for just chatting with a boy on Facebook. And even more shocking was the portrayal of the case by the Saudi media, blaming Facebook for creating strife in the country (The Telegraph, 17th January, 2013)[2].
Mostly, women in such secluded societies are brought up with a mental block and limited exposure. So, some of them don’t mind or realise discrimination in different formats, accepting them as the way of life. Nevertheless, this set-up is against international law (Human Rights Watch Report, 2008), and gradually, the new better educated generation of Saudi women are starting to realise that.
Manal al-Sharif, the face of Women2Drive campaign, has become a beacon of hope to other women there. Being a women activist, she drove in the streets of Khobar campaigning against the strict driving law against women in that country. She was arrested the next day on the charges of ‘incitement to public disorder’, and later released on bail with conditions such as not driving ever in her life, returning for questioning when summoned and not talking to the press about the incident. However, the authorities have not been able to seal her lips. She has opened a feminist pressure group, My Right to Dignity that voices Saudi women’s urge to rise above the second class citizenship they now maintain. Braving death threats and a job sack, she has been the toughest women activist in Saudi Arabia the world has ever witnessed (The Independent, 23rd May, 2012[3]).
Most recently, King Abdullah has granted women seats on Saudi Arabia’s top advisory council, the Shura Council. Even though the council has no legislative powers, this move gives hope to many women such as Wajeda al-Hawedar, who feels it will at least make an impact on the image of women in the country. King Abdullah has also inaugurated the first university in the country that doesn’t segregate the two genders and granted women the right to vote in 2015 municipal elections without the permission of a male guardian. (NY Daily News, 11th January, 2013)[4].
Even though chatting on Facebook with a man, or having coffee with a male friend in a café (considered commonplace in many other parts of the world), remains a far cry from the present Saudi Arabian culture, but such movements by the government along with protests by women such as Manal al-Sharif are obviously laudable and should be supported by the rest of the world, so that the Saudi women can have the opportunity to exhibit their potentials beyond closed doors.
Protesting in a country where women have legal rights is very different from protesting in one which doesn’t.  Hopefully, such countries would continue to have brave women like Manal, who would fight to uplift the status quo of a woman in accordance with international human rights laws. Going by Mahatma Gandhi’s words, ‘First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win’, I am sure Manal you are almost there and driving towards your goal very fast. All the best!

By Parama Bal

[1] See http://www.hrw.org/reports/2008/saudiarabia0408/2.htm
[2] See http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1583420/Saudi-woman-killed-for-chatting-on-Facebook.html
[3] See http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/manal-alsharif-they-just-messed-with-the-wrong-woman-7778800.html
[4] See http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/saudi-king-grants-women-seats-advisory-council-article-1.1238207

Wednesday, 22 August 2012

A Breeze of Change in Saudi Arabia........




By Saudi Arabian law, women were, until recently, not permitted to compete in the Olympic Games.However, following the International Olympic Committee pressuring the Saudi Olympic Committee to send female athletes to the 2012 Summer Olympics, in June 2012 the Saudi Embassy in London announced this had been agreed.


There had been calls for Saudi Arabia to be barred from the Olympics until it permitted women to compete - notably from Anita DeFrantz, chair of the International Olympic Committee's Women and Sports Commission, in 2010.In 2008, Ali Al-Ahmed, director of the Institute for Gulf Affairs, likewise called for Saudi Arabia to be barred from the Games, describing its ban on women athletes as a violation of the International Olympic Committee charter. Stating that gender discrimination should be no more acceptable than racial discrimination, he noted: "For the last 15 years, many international nongovernmental organizations worldwide have been trying to lobby the IOC for better enforcement of its own laws banning gender discrimination. [...] While their efforts did result in increasing numbers of women Olympians, the IOC has been reluctant to take a strong position and threaten the discriminating countries with suspension or expulsion.


Dalma Rushdi Malhas cpmpeted the 2010 Singapore Youth Olympics and won a bronze medal in equestrian.
The appearance of Saudi Arabia's first female Olympic athletes at the Games' opening ceremony prompted a heated online debate on Saturday, with some conservative Islamists denouncing the women as shameless but many praising them.


Wojdan Ali Seraj Abdulrahim Shaherkani, who is to compete in the +78kg judo category, and 800 metre runner Sarah Attar marched behind the men in their national delegation during the ceremony in London on Friday.
Conservative Muslim clerics in Saudi Arabia oppose women's sport, arguing that it is immodest and goes against their nature. That view was reflected in Twitter postings including one under a hashtag that would translate as "Olympic_Whores".


"One should not hesitate to describe their participation as shameful and a great sin," Khaled al-Jabri, whose Twitter profile listed him as a Saudi from Jeddah, wrote on Saturday in one of thousands of postings on the subject that ran in the hours after the ceremony.


"Whores of the Olympics...They want to run so that they intentionally fall down and reveal (their figures)," said a tweeter under the name @mloven2100, who identified himself as a Saudi.


"I'm proud of Saudi women's participation in the Olympics," wrote Fahad al-Enzi, a member of a prominent Saudi tribe whose profile listed him as from Riyadh.


A woman who identified herself as Safaa, a Saudi, tweeted: "Women walking behind the Saudi delegation is historic. Next we'll be carrying the flag and walking side by side, equal."


Before this year Saudi Arabia was one of three countries, alongside Brunei and Qatar, never to have sent female athletes to the Olympics. The latter two confirmed earlier this year that their delegations would include women.


Saudi Arabia reached an agreement on the participation of Shaherkani and Attar just two weeks ago in talks with the International Olympic Committee. Human rights groups had urged the IOC to ban the country from the Games unless it agreed to send women.


Riyadh's decision followed a series of cautious steps expanding women's rights over the past 18 months. King Abdullah, who has a reputation as a reformer, last year announced plans to let women vote in municipal council elections and join the consultative Shoura Council.


And this is a “Jasmine Revolution” which has brought a change of mind towards the women of the Country atleast identifying then as individuals rather than as a group who were downtrodden and weak without even having any basic Rights as a Human Being.Let this prevail all over the Middle East so that the Countries get a new address of Freedom for Women infront of the world.