Showing posts with label Women's Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Women's Rights. Show all posts

Friday, 13 March 2015

Women’s Rights in the Arab World

By Welton O’Neal III

When we think of women’s rights, we often think of women in the Western world trying to obtain equal rights and opportunities such as equal salaries, political representation, etc. We also think of how other cultures and regions outside of the Western world can adopt this ideology to further advance the rights and treatment of women within their society. Whether or not women’s rights is rooted in Western ideology is debatable. But women do have rights that exist in other regions of the world outside of the West, which was developed domestically or it came about via Western import. One region of the world where women right’s exist but is also under heavy scrutiny within the international arena is the Arab.

 What first must be understood is the meaning of women’s rights. Women's rights are the rights and entitlements claimed for women and girls of many societies worldwide. In some places, these rights are institutionalized or supported by law, local custom, and behavior, whereas in others they may be ignored or suppressed.[1] With this understanding, the ideology can be better understood and how it exists in the Arab world. However, the existence of women’s rights is not cohesive in the Arab world and just like the rest of the world, it varies from country to country.

          Within the Arab world, women in eight of the countries experience sexual violence, harassment, and trafficking. Sexual violence such as rape is not recognized as a crime and the victim in countries such as Saudi Arabia, could face charges of adultery.[2] Often times they face forms of gender discrimination in both the workplace and in public in countries such as in Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Algeria. Most of these countries don’t allow political participation with the only exception being Saudi Arabia whom allowed women to vote in municipal elections this year, 2015.[3] There are very little efforts to implement policies that advance gender equality prevent the occurrence of sexual violence, harassment, and trafficking. Thus in cases like these, feminism hasn’t been adopted entirely and therefore hasn’t progressed women’s rights in these countries.[4]

          However, there are countries where women’s rights has thrived and has progressed the country towards equal rights for women. In countries such as Tunisia, women have abortion rights and can pass citizenship onto to their husbands as well as having 61 women being elected to the 217-member Constituent Assembly since 2011.[5] In other countries such as Libya allows women to have greater political representation with 33 women were elected to the 200-member General National Congress in 2012. Within Djibouti, the country has implemented various laws that discriminate against women long with enacting a 2009 law that improves the living conditions of low-income women. With the U.A.E women have access to education and health services along with having 4 women sit on the 22-member cabinet of the Federal National Council.[6]

            Knowing this, bit of information, the next question is how can women’s rights progress in countries that do and don’t acknowledge them in the Arab world? Aside from acknowledging that there are women’s rights and human rights movements and individuals that exist to further progress policies that favor women in this region, it is more so important to not generalize the region. It is true that there are countries in the region that lack women’s rights laws but it is also true that there are countries that do acknowledge them. By generalizing that all countries in a region have the same exact policies and viewpoints on an issue only sets the movement of progress backwards rather than moving it towards equality. Thus it is important that every country should be analyzed on a case by case basis and by doing, can the rest of the world understand not only the policies in that country but also in that region.



[1] Hosken, Fran P., 'Towards a Definition of Women's Rights' in Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 2. (May, 1981), pp. 1–10.)
[2] Kehoe, Karrie. "Factbox: Women's Rights in the Arab World." Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 11 Nov. 2013. Web. 7 Mar. 2015.
[3] Ibid
[4] Ibid
[5] Ibid
[6] Ibid

Monday, 9 March 2015

prey walking in street.(sexual harassment in Egypt)



I still remember the tears falling from my cousin eyes when she told me how little boys have touched her body strongly while she was walking in dark street she was only 11years old . I remember how it frightened me that I didn’t get out alone without my father.it was sience 12 years
Sexual harassment spreader in Egypt since 2003 and as there was no one fight it even women feel shame to say that she harassed  its increased gradually to reach its peak at 2011.
 Now days .Sexual harassment has scary violent face as since 6 months  huge group of youth stripped lady clothing in Tahrir square and harassed her , lady was rescued hardly and entered hospital in horrible case there were several wounds in her body and vaginal bleeding.
Although there are many Egyptian non- governmental organizations fight sexual harassment like (shoft Tahrosh) , (catch harasser) and (harassment map) it hasn’t real influence as Egyptian police didn’t consider sexual harassment a real crime although Egyptian law have increased its penalty to Life imprison.
The problem is very huge and it seemed to be clueless as little child consider that sexual harassment is sort of having fun and youth justify it aas women be happy when she is harassed and the  victim keep silence as the society always think that she is wrong she wore sexy cloths although most of Egyptian women wear veil.
The only way to stop this horrible phenomenon will be by learning child to respect woman and achieve huge ethics development and making groups of volunteers resist sexual harassment with learning women self defense and increasing role of anti- sexual harassment organizations.
By / Aya A. Alashuah

Sexual harassment in Tahrir square






Tuesday, 3 March 2015

Abortion regulations in Ireland:Are you ready?

Written by Jafreen Alamgir
When my parents used to give me a present during my childhood for doing well in my exams, it was a ticket to the place I desire to travel. So, isn’t it exciting when you can travel the world and explore and learn new things? But such feelings go away when you are in desperate need to go abroad.

This is what is happening to the women of Ireland. When they go abroad for abortion, they go in fear of their image in front of their society and the obstacles they might face while travelling.Many women in Ireland are unable to get access to abortions. It has been a significant issue which is less being taken into account by the government of Ireland. Abortion is the killing of child which is not born yet. Yes, may be it sounds like taking away a life of an innocent child. But it becomes crucial when she is suffering from medical problems which give her no other alternative other than abortion.
The first question is why women in Ireland aren’t given the opportunity to get access to abortion facilities as Ireland is one of the developed countries. Moreover, it is a modern knowledge economy which should have understood the importance of abortion rights for women. But the case is otherwise. Women in Ireland are not even made aware of when they should take the decision to abort despite having regular contact with gynecologists. They expect that the state is going to provide them with necessary information about abortion facilities. And the response has been inconsistent and disruptive which explains that the state barely wants to take into account of its capability for at least the provision of right information to the women of Ireland.

The second question is what obstacles women are facing when they have no other alternative other than abortion to solve the problems of pregnancy. Women might want to make decisions to abort, perhaps because they want to control the size of her family, forget the dark secret of a relationship, or when they face gynecological problems. Whatever is the issue, the matter should be kept personal since it is a matter of personal privacy and women of a developed country should not be deprived of that. Otherwise it will be too hard for the government of developing countries to understand the privilege of women who belong to their soils.

All in all, we as women should understand that we are the main contributor to the change in the way we are viewed in the society. And that is possible when we are innovative to bring up new ideas for the existence of the feminism around the world through discussing what changes we can bring to the anti-abortion movement.


Friday, 19 December 2014

Our Mental State.

It hurts that we are somewhat satisfied being the symbol of weakness, uneducated decisions and inepititude. Offcourse, it's nice for someone else to take the whole blame, i mean yeah! we can blame the world for defining but then who is to blame for accepting, who is the blame for letting them? We can blame every other person all we want but at the end we played a huge part in getting to where we are right now.
  This war we are fighting is not just a physical one but mostly mental. Our mental state. The world and this context, especially African women have agreed to the society's idea of who and what a woman is in some way. I mean yes we can go out and claim that we are feminist because we have the kids and the job or because we let our hair grow natural and so on. The real question is where are the female inventors and ground breaking scientists coming up with cures being role models to the little, anxious girl in secondary school who is most excited when she is in chemistry class or that get inspired just by looking up at the sky, but nooo we can't stay too long in school studying those kind of courses cause then who is going to be left to marry us, while, those that dare to take up this courses then move on to be frustrated by the same society that is supposed to be embracing them.
  Let me tell you were a lot of us are failing. I often hear guys say "I'm looking for a reserved girl, or oh! she stays with her folks she's definitely the marriageble type a good girl". They sure didn't come up with that on their own. So where are the mothers, aunties teaching what really to look for in a lady, not naive, gullible, submissive and obedience, which mum will not freak out when they see their son come in with a lady that has a strong opinion of what she wants her home to look like. Do you know that men are attracted to omen like their mothers. Granted our moms and their moms before that did not teach them any better. So we have refused to teach our kids to dream , dream beyond society limitations. We have let the word feminist to even exist and noe become irky in conversations. Well at least we get to go school around here right? Still it won't hurt to move forward and allow these girls use  them to build skyscrappers and walk through the glass doors of their companies instead of just having a flashy marriage resume.
We need people and i don't mean 5 or 10 amoungst millions though that's a start to pave the way for those budding girls, those that have have tuned out the world telling them they've got "big eyes" or how impossible their dreams are and question them at every turn. They want it and they are willing to do the work for it. They are wondering if they'll need to sleep with everyone who they give a proposal to or if they must take on a male business partner before they can be taken seriously. All they need is a chance to prove themselves.
Yes,there is a movement though not as loud as it needs to be, or fast because most of us are too ashamed to stand with this cause which is our birth right, and yes we now have songs, books, papers, calling us out to this remarkable awakening but still they are still those of those tht are letting people use the word "feminist" as an inside joke for women that are either are sucessful and strong that it intimidates or threaten their egos or for those ladies that are either unattractive or unmarried. We will keep sharing the joke until our daughters can't even say the word "feminist" because then it has become a curse word.
We need to fight it little by little but everyday, it could be as small as giving a thumbs up! and a sacarstic smile to that lady that says "you drive like a lady" or do something like a lady to tell them we are glad we are the best at whatever we do. When you here someone explain with "oh it's cause she's a woman" nicely say "Your mom is a woman".

Finally, i would like to say amounggst every division that humans have found to fight about in the world Race, religion, countries when it comes to gender we are not struggling for supremacy, we are just asking for Equality. How hard is that?

By George Agba

Tuesday, 24 December 2013

Late blooming of women’s rights

Source: http://www.arabnews.com/news/497021


Islam has given women their rights to be educated, inherit, and to have a voice in domestic as well as public life 1,400 years ago when the rest of the world did not even consider women’s rights to be an issue. 

Ironically, the same religion is practiced nowadays in Saudi Arabia, which is the land of the birth of Islam, as a tool to justify violations of women’s rights. Unfortunately, some of the Arab or should one say tribal traditions and customs, which even predated Islam, have crept into our lives and got confused with Islamic teachings. As a result, many women have not only been oppressed, but they have been convinced that true gender equality is against their Islamic beliefs. This connotation has delayed the demand for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia in comparison with the rest of the world mainly because many people would question the piety of any woman who would demand true gender equality.

Accordingly, the recent emerge of women’s movement in Saudi Arabia has not been based on “secular feminism,” but is rather characterized by “Islamic feminism,” which is based on the belief that there is a possibility of having different interpretations of Islamic sacred texts, in which true gender equality can be found within the framework of Islam. Of course, conservative elements oppose this movement claiming that if it were true, great Muslim scholars would have thought of them earlier. Unfortunately, the claim asserts the sad reality of the patriarchal society we live in, where men cannot even fathom the idea that women can participate in a field that has been monopolized by men for so long. In addition, Islam is supposed to fit every age and place and this cannot happen if we refuse to allow the interpretations to evolve and change over time in order to reflect people’s educational, intellectual, and cultural backgrounds. 

The late modernization of Saudi Arabia has also contributed to the delay in the Saudi women’s movement. This has led women to stay preoccupied with strenuous domestic chores in addition to taking care of their kids, who used to have a high mortality rate up to the 1970s. Even when the country was modernized, modernity was “imported” from the West. 

This “importation” interfered with the normal transformation a society undergoes when it develops and evolves at its own rate creating intellectual gaps between people who come from diverse backgrounds in the first place. The “sudden” change also led conservatives to cling more to their old ways of life and to fear modernity, while others, especially women, found liberation and power in education. 

Another problem is that many legislations in Saudi Arabia reinforces men’s supremacist attitude toward women. For example, women of all ages need a male guardian even if her “guardian” himself believes that she is a capable, independent woman who should be allowed to travel, for example, without taking his permission. According to these legislations, a woman is so incapable of taking care of herself that if she is not married and her father passes away, her son could be assigned as her guardian. In this case, it seems that being a woman even precedes the honor of being a mother whom the Prophet (pbuh) asserts that heaven is under her feet, while she is obliged to take her son’s permission to take many legal and personal decisions.

In Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah’s reign, the development rate of women’s rights seems to have gathered pace, which include increasing female participation in the workforce and even allowing women to participate in the Shoura Council. 

The problem is that with the rapid increase of development, contradictions in women’s rights started to emerge as well. For example, women who live in Saudi Arabia are still not allowed to drive cars, which seems like one of the most basic rights women should have before holding any official position. 

However, the progress seems to start with the relatively least controversial issues to conservatives while at the same time it appears like a huge development to those who demand change. This means that the progress is not necessarily logically gradual, but rather “safely” gradual.

The progress of women’s rights in Saudi Arabia was late in comparison with their counterparts around the world not because Saudi women are weak or incapable because when given the chance they have proved to be strong and accomplished individuals in all areas of life. 

Saudi women who demand change are proud of their Islamic heritage and Arabic identity, but they are calling for the respect and the appreciation that they deserve. 

Therefore, legislations need to be changed and sometimes created in order to further empower women in Saudi Arabia. More importantly, culture should be differentiated from religion and oppressive actions should not be justified as part of our noble Islamic teachings.

Monday, 9 December 2013

Nelson Mandela’s Role in Women’s Rights


December 6, 2013


By Sabrina Willard

“Let us join hands, in response to the call of the women, for Unity, Peace and Development. Let us enter the new century with concrete results to measure our beautiful words.

Equal power and glory to the Women of South Africa!”

In this excerpt from his 1996 Women’s Day speech, Nelson Mandela acknowledged women’s role in society and urged for more female representation in South African government. In light of his recent passing, Jezebel posted an article highlighting what the apartheid activist, Nobel Peace Prize winner, and first black president of South Africa has done for women throughout his long and distinguished career as a humanitarian.

Mandela was instrumental in the ratification of the United Nation’s Convention to End All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), a pact “often described as an international bill of rights for women” (UN website, accessed December 6, 2013). The document was groundbreaking in that it attempted to establish an international definition for what is considered gender discrimination and set “an agenda for national action to end such discrimination.” The then-President of South Africa signed-on to CEDAW in 1995, setting a precedent for the various political decisions concerning women to follow.

As the article further notes, Nelson Mandela kept the welfare of women in mind throughout his tenure as the first president of a democratically-elected South African parliament. In 1997, Mandela ensured that the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa contained passages prohibiting all types of discrimination and promoting gender equality.

His belief that women should lean into positions of power was reflected in the make-up of his own administration, where cabinet members were appointed regardless of sex. Global Fund for Women board member Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka recently commented on the legacy he left in an article posted to the organization’s website. Born and raised in South Africa, Mlambo-Ngcuka witnessed Nelson Mandela’s push for gender equality first-hand while serving as Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry during his administration.

“Some of the key policies enacted during his presidency were free prenatal care postnatal care to mothers in the public health system and free health care to children up to the age of six. He also introduced a social wage in the form of a child grant paid to children of poor and unemployed mothers, as well pensions for older persons and a social grants paid to for disabled unable to work" (Global Fund for Women website, accessed December 7, 2013).


While descriptions such as “civil rights activist”, “humanitarian”, and “peace keeper” may all come to mind when describing Nelson Mandela’s many accomplishments, I think many would be surprised to hear “feminist” thrown into the mix. As we mourn the loss of this incredible man who spent his life fighting for peace and justice, we would do good to note the things he did to make everyday life better for the women of South Africa. 

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

Women's Rights Are Linked to U.S.-Iran Negotiations


 Source: http://www.payvand.com/news/13/nov/1015.html

On Sept. 22, the Iranian parliament passed a law with an innocuous title but frightening potential. The “Protection of Children and Adolescents without Guardians or with Bad Guardians” allows a man to marry his stepdaughter or adopted daughter, in effect legalising child abuse.
The law repeals a previous piece of legislation passed by parliament in February that forbade such marriages. However, the Council of Guardians, a clerical body dominated by hardliners, disapproved the earlier law, finding it against sharia.
The latest iteration added an article (27) which says that a father may marry his stepdaughter or adopted daughter if the marriage is approved by the State Welfare Organisation and a court. In spite of this addition, many Iranians fear the new law will undermine the welfare of thousands of families with stepdaughters and adopted daughters.
Iranian women’s organisations and human rights activists both inside Iran and in the diaspora have organised massive protests against the law on Facebook. The rights groups and activists assert that the law legalises pedophilia, child abuse and rape under the guise of protecting children. Most Iranians were not aware of the controversy until the second bill passed in parliament last month.
Women’s sexuality is one of the most sensitive battlefields within the Islamic Republic of Iran. In Iran, women’s bodies are a political subject; control over their bodies is a reflection of political power. Women’s sexuality is a tool for Islamic conservatives to demonstrate their interpretation of Islamic ideology and identity.
While President Rouhani has talked repeatedly of his respect for women’s rights, he has been silent about the new law. In ratifying the law on Oct. 2, the 12 Islamic conservatives who make up the Council of Guardians demonstrated that they still have power and control over the most sensitive political matters. These are the same individuals who, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, will approve or reject any nuclear compromise Rouhani makes with the United States.
Women’s rights activists are wondering whether Rouhani will speak out about the marriage law in the near future. If the president and his cabinet oppose this radical and immoral law, he will show that he supports democracy and equal rights for women. If he is silent, it will show that he either will not or cannot oppose the Islamic conservatives on a crucial matter.
Iranian women have shown that they have potential power to affect change in Iran in the direction of more democracy and human rights. Iranian women have been fighting for their rights for more than a century and the women’s movement began with the Iranian Constitutional Revolution of 1906. Beginning in the 1920s, women began to attend universities although they did not achieve the right to vote and be elected to office until 1963.
Women were also in the front lines of the 1979 revolution against the Shah. But the Islamic government that replaced the monarchy diminished women’s rights, scrapping the Shah’s progressive family law and reducing the legal age of marriage from 18 to nine.
A re-invigorated movement succeeded in raising the age to 13. Today the average age of marriage for girls is 24. Iranian women have also attained a high educational standard, comprising more than 60 percent of university students. Population growth has slowed as women have become more educated; the average number of children women bear has dropped from seven in 1960s to two in 2010.
Women are also the most organised element of Iranian society, with about 5,000 women’s groups. They work together to promote their rights despite differences in religious beliefs, ethnic identity and political factions.
The best known effort is the One Million Signatures Campaign for Gender Equality, which has been promoted by key figures including human rights lawyer Shirin Ebadi, the 2003 recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. The campaign has mobilised several thousand women debating women’s rights and collecting signatures to change laws that discriminate against women.
More than 70 women’s activists were arrested and sent to prison for their participation in this campaign, which was the most organised element during the 2009 Green Movement. “Women will build democracy in Iran,” Ebadi has said.
A victory for Iranian women is a failure for Islamic conservatives who view controlling women’s sexuality and oppressing women’s organisations as part of conservatives’ fight for survival.
In negotiating with Iran about its nuclear program, the Obama administration should not forget about women’s rights and the need to strengthen civil society and support for human rights and democracy in Iran.

About the author: Fariba Parsa is a visiting scholar at the Centre for the Study of Gender and Conflict, George Mason University School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution.

Friday, 26 April 2013

Women's rights, 1968 to 2013: Have things really changed?

Source

In 1968, the women’s liberation movement was in full force.



The Saturday Evening Post entered the fray with a long-form story headlined “Women at Work: Is there room at the top?” The story focused on successful female executives “in a man’s world.”

One is quoted as saying, “I usually eat lunch alone. The men all go together — they’d never dream of asking me. I’m supposed to eat with the typists, I guess.”

How much have things changed? Perhaps not as much as you might think.

The article quotes several women frustrated that they make less money than men for the same job. A copywriter said she makes only $8,000 per year, while her male colleagues earn $11,000. A production “manager” replaced her former boss, a production “director,” but earned $4,000 less per year.

Now skip forward 45 years. Women in Oregon earn only 78 cents per every dollar men earn, and that, believe it or not, exceeds the national average. Only one woman — Schnitzer Steel’s Tamara Lundgren — leads a top 50 Oregon public company. Women are under-represented in Oregon boardrooms.

I think of this because we’re preparing for our annual Women of Influence awards April 18, where we honor 25 outstanding businesswomen for their contributions to both their companies and communities. You can meet them here.

Earlier this month, the awards program created an impassioned debate in the Portland Business Journal newsroom whether it was still necessary — in 2013 — to single out women for recognition.

We’ll have a complete package of stories in Friday's print edition about the challenges and obstacles Portland female executives must confront every day.

In the meantime, what do you think? Does gender bias still exist in the workplace?
The first black female was elected to Congress. Protestors gathered outside the annual Miss America Pageant. Activists were advocating for the Equal Rights Amendment.

Friday, 19 April 2013

Women and the G8


April 10 marked the date when an epoch making milestone marked the longstanding fight to bring gender violence in conflict to an end. Eight foreign ministers from the world’s wealthiest countries came together under the banner of the G8 and had conflict-related sexual violence was on the agenda.

Conflict-settings have been a thriving hotbed of impunity when it comes to sexual violence. Whether it was in the Second World War, or in the Bosnia-Herzegovina war and the Rwandan war in the 1990s, or in the continued state of armed conflict in Syria and DR Congo, thousands of women have been brutally raped. Rape in conflict is a reflection of the myriads of undercurrents that prevail in society in peacetime – and when manifested so brutally in wartime, rape is destructive and detrimental to the fabric of international peace and security. UN Security Council resolutions and plenty of raw international frameworks specifically addressing sexual violence came about: but the progress itself was rather slow and incomplete. Wars continued to occur, and women were continuously bearing the brunt of sexual violence. Bodies remained battlegrounds, societies were crippled and rehabilitation was too much of a distant dream.

Till date, much of the action taken in remedying the broken lives of the women in conflict zones has been the domain of the non-profit sector and civilian participation, with a small involvement from governments and other intergovernmental organizations. These organizations have been involved in convincing the world’s leaders of the need to devote attention to the cause of women in conflict zones. Initiatives were made by the United States for the DR Congo with close reference to the conflict minerals that were being mined in the region, fuelling the continuation of sexual violence. However, this is the first official time that a concerted effort in listening and responding to sexual violence in conflict has been made.

Conflict is a hotbed for sexual violence. But this is not an issue that affects women alone. Conflict rape is a reflection of a greater ethos: the fact that women are not only disrespected, but are also the link in the chain that is sought to be broken in order to break the entire chain. Gender-based violence rips up society and leaves its every edifice shattered. And there is no doubt that this will continue to be the face of the future – even as more and more complexities in the world, political, social, economical and climatic come to fore – as women will be forced to bear the consequences of the conflicts that these factors can spark off.

What the G8 has initiated is historic, no doubt. But it has to be sustained. It is not a one-time commitment, and it is certainly not a one-meeting dialogue that will count. Sustained effort and complete overhaul is necessary. Support for survivors is one thing: but the greater need of the hour is to bring the culture of impunity to an end once and for all.


Monday, 8 April 2013

Women’s rights see patchy progress across Arab world in wake of revolutions




Libya: A guarantee of equality has been removed from the new constitution written after the revolution in 2011. There has been a rise in sexual assaults on the streets. Amnesty International claims discrimination against women “remains in law and practice.”
Yemen: Women were prominent during the 2011 uprisings but demonstrators today segregate themselves by gender. Discrimination is still enshrined in law. A quota of 30 percent for women in jobs in state agencies has been proposed but not yet debated. Child marriage remains legal with 52 percent of women marrying under 18.
Morocco: Reforms promised by King Mohamed VI are inching forward. A law that allows rapists to escape prison if they marry their victim is expected to be amended this year. Child marriage is illegal but has been on the rise over the past two years and there are moves to reduce the legal age from 18 to 16. There is only one female minister.
Tunisia: Women’s legal rights have not changed since the revolution in 2010-11 but it took violent street protests before the new constitution was rewritten to enshrine full equality. The ruling Islamist Ennahda party has 42 women among its 89 lawmakers and only 3 percent of teenage girls are married. Some in the country are worried about a rise in hardline conservatism.

Source: Japan Times

Saturday, 26 January 2013

Lawyer and Women's Rights Activist Hopes Discriminatory Passport Law Does Not Pass

Source: International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran
Lawyer and women’s rights activist Farideh Gheirat told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran that the new Passport and Exit Law bill, which will make it mandatory for girls and women to have the approval of their “guardian” (father, husband, or paternal grandfather) to exit the country, is at odds with the Iranian Constitution. Farideh Gheirat expressed hope that the bill will not be approved.

Lawyer and women’s rights activist Farideh Gheirat
According to Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA), the resolution that was passed on Tuesday, January 15, allows unmarried women over the age of 18 to obtain passports, but will not allow them to leave the country without permission from their guardians.
The government presented the Parliament with the bill in April 2012, and the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Parliament approved it on November 15. According to the bill, single women under the age of 40 will need the official agreement of their guardian or the Sharia Judge. Women’s rights and civil activists were quick to object to the plan. In the end, Parliament members decided to remove the age requirement (40 years old), and separated the law about who can possess a passport from the law which governs exit of women from the country.
“The new resolution poses new restrictions and is certainly not acceptable to us. This law even contradicts the Constitution. The Constitution of the Islamic Republic views everything equally for men and women,” she told the Campaign. “At 18 years of age, men and women earn the right to do many things, and just as men don’t need permission to leave the country, so should women. If there are risks awaiting those who leave the country, they don’t just threaten girls, they also put men at risk,” Farideh Gheirat told the Campaign.
When asked why the MP’s would want to pass this bill, Mehdi Davatgari, a member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Parliament has been quoted to say, “Members of the Commission believe that Iranian morality demands that girls who are after moral corruption should not be allowed to leave the country.”
According to the new resolution, married women not only need their husbands’ permission for leaving the country, they will also need it for possessing a passport as well. Additionally, if a woman’s father or husband first grants her permission to leave the country but after a while, for whatever reason, rescinds the permission, the woman’s passport will be confiscated.
Although the resolution does not elaborate on who “single women above the age of 18″ are specifically, this definition will most likely also include divorced women. At this time many women’s rights activists ask what use would a passport have if they cannot use it to leave the country without the permission of fathers or grandfathers, especially as, according to the same resolution, a husband or a guardian can order confiscation of her passport?
Farideh Gheirat told the Campaign she hopes this resolution would never come to pass. “A [young] woman cannot be the only cause of ‘corruption.’ If a [young] woman’s travel abroad causes ‘corruption,’ the same will be case for [young] men, too. Haven’t we heard that the gentlemen have exported girls abroad for immoral activities? It was the gentlemen who did this. It is not right to strip a woman of her authority to make decisions about her own affairs just because she is a woman. Like men, when a woman reaches the age of 18, she assumes legal maturity and is able to do anything, therefore she should also be allowed to leave the country herself. Why do we say that a woman’s every action could face moral issues? If we are concerned, we must promote morality in the society or do other things. Anyhow, I hope that this resolution will never pass,” she said.
“With such resolutions, MP’s show that they have no relation to nor understanding of the society. This resolution indicates the MP’s unrealistic view to the society and their fear of women. Currently a large part of the women in the society are economically independent and they are even heads of households; rate of education among women is very high and naturally such growth increases their demands, too. Such resolutions are limitations put on women that unless changed, will lead to a backlash from women. Really, what need do hose who are economically independent now have for their ‘guardian’s’ permission to leave the country or not?”va women’s rights reporter who requested anonymity told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran.

Friday, 25 January 2013

What Do Women’s Rights Mean to You?

Source: http://www.osundefender.org/?p=89208

CHANGING
The tidal wave of feminism sweeping across the global community has had a particular bearing on the postwar mosaic of Africa’s oldest republic, Liberia, in a number of ways. The country broke continental record with the election of the first female president some seven years ago, and less than a year ago produced twin female Nobel laureates.
In another feminist watershed, Liberia is playing host to an assembly of distinguished female leaders expected to showcase the struggle for women employment and advocacy. Monrovia is alight this week by the presence of distinguished women activists of international repute, including a couple of Nobel laureates.
Liberia’s own Leymah Gbowee, who are President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf jointly won the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize, is hosting throngs of women from the United States, Canada, and other countries. The visitors, according to a release from Laureate Gbowee’s foundation include four Nobel Peace Laureates, journalists, businesswomen, global and grassroots women’s rights activists and philanthropists who will stay in the country for six days.
During the nearly week-long visit, the women, under the banner of the international organization Nobel Women’s Initiative will meet with a wide range of non-governmental women’s groups, UN personnel, Youth and Student Leaders, the Women Legislative Caucus and other high-level government officials, Women Peace-builders in Totota and Weala, Bong County, amongst others. The world leaders are also expected to give audience to Liberian women working towards peace and reconciliation in the country, particularly on sexual violence issues.
The women delegates, according to the release, hope to take back home a greater understanding of the important contributions women are making to sustainable peace in Liberia, as well as the challenges women face.  

Sunday, 30 December 2012

Once a girl, Always a girl

Virginity test is a traditional yet very controversial practice in many countries. It is considered degrading and a violation of human rights by Amnesty International and although it is illegal in many countries, It is still done in African countries as an excuse to prevent AIDS but it's mainly to examine if a girl is still a virgin.

In Iran where Virginity is still a cultural issue right beside Unemployment, inflation and political issues, young women try a risky surgery to regain "Respect" from people who still believe that a woman's grace lies beneath her virginity.


This 30-minute outpatient procedure, called "hymenoplasty" and costing between 1,500 and 3,000 euros ($2,000-$4,000), is increasingly popular among young women of North African descent in France.


Premarital sex among young men is no longer seen as quite out of bounds  in Iran. It is even a trend that gains applause from the Iranian men. Yet for a woman planning to marry, the tradition that she must be a virgin is still upheld.


"A girl's decency is defined on the basis of virginity". A student of mine says in the English class. most of the young classmates agree and the rest of the girls blush. This mixed beliefs always distracts me and I dismiss the class. Why do we have to continue being the victim of others inhumanity.

As a free young woman in this world, I still can't figure out why we should respect the people who don't respect a woman's choice in life. In Iran, there are uncountable stories of girls losing their lives or going behind the bars just because they chose the natural path of sexual freedom and I'm sure the story doesn't finish right here unless we, men and women who want nothing but a better, more free and peaceful world, chance the way we look at things.
The new years resolution: why not giving ourselves a minute and think why we judge people by their sexual choices?


Aren't we born free? Don't we die free? Then, Why can't we live free?


Never judge a girl by her clothes or her lifestyle.


Once a girl, always a girl.


By Elaheh Zohrevandi

Monday, 19 November 2012

Justice Access Is Human Right - Women in Poverty Challenges -


Sourced from here

 

 
 
In her report the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty highlights the particular problems faced by women in seeking justice and formal legal redress.
 
JUSTICE ACCESS IS HUMAN RIGHT FOR ALL, INCLUDING THOSE IN EXTREME POVERTY - WOMEN - UN SR POVERTY

NEW YORK (5 November 2012) – “Access to justice is a human right in itself, and essential for tackling
 the root causes of poverty” said today the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty, 
Magdalena Sepúlveda, in her report to the UN General Assembly*. “Without access to justice, people 
living in poverty are unable to claim their rights, or challenge crimes, abuses or violations committed against 
them, trapping them in a vicious circle of impunity, deprivation and exclusion.”

The UN expert emphasized the many obstacles faced by those living in poverty in seeking legal redress 
through the formal judicial system. They include a lack of financial resources and awareness of legal rights;
fear of reprisal or further stigmatization; and inadequate capacity of the judicial system (often resulting in 
under-prioritization of cases and the imposition of unaffordable fees). These obstacles are compounded by 
deeply entrenched societal prejudices and stereotypes against the poor.

“There are a number of worrying trends impeding those living in poverty from enjoying the same rights 
as others in accessing justice” said Ms. Sepúlveda. In her report she highlights the particular problems
 faced by women in seeking formal redress. “Inadequate legal frameworks fail to recognise the financial 
impediments they often suffer as well as social and cultural constraints which may prevent them from 
speaking out against abuses or seeking justice” said the UN expert.

She also notes that “the provision of free and competent legal advice and assistance to those who are 
otherwise unable to afford it is a fundamental prerequisite for ensuring that all individuals have fair and 
equal access to judicial and adjudicatory mechanisms”. Ms. Sepúlveda highlighted the need for States 
“to ensure that free legal aid is provided in both civil and criminal cases where the rights and interests 
of persons living in poverty are at stake”.

While the world continues to suffer the consequences of the global financial crisis, with persons living 
in poverty enduring the most devastating impacts, the Special Rapporteur opened her statement today 
by welcoming the adoption of the Guiding Principles on extreme poverty and human rights (see below) 
by the UN Human Rights Council in September 2012.

“This is a small but significant step forward,” the expert said. These Principles could play a key role in 
protecting and empowering those who are hit hardest by the global economic crisis, by tackling obstacles 
which obstruct their enjoyment of rights, including access to justice.”

“The Guiding Principles provide the first global policy guidelines applying States’ human rights obligations 
to the specific situation of people living in poverty,” said Ms. Sepúlveda. “This is a practical tool for 
policy-makers to ensure that public policies (including poverty eradication efforts) reach persons living in 
poverty and respect and uphold all their rights.”

The independent human rights expert called upon the UN General Assembly to endorse the Principles 
and take concrete measures to ensure their widest dissemination and implementation at the domestic level.

Magdalena Sepúlveda (Chile) was appointed as the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human 
rights in May 2008 by the United Nations Human Rights Council. She is independent from any government 
or organization. 

Thursday, 8 November 2012

A New Dawn for Women in Botswana: The Landmark Ruling on Women’s Rights to Inherit Property



The notion of inheritance is a universal concept referring to “the devolution of title to property under the law of descent and distribution”[1]. However each society has come up with its own laws and policies on inheritance. In the case of Botswana, the country relies on customary law. The Administration of Estates Act categorically states that devolution of property is according to the customs and practices of a particular ethnic group unless one formally excludes himself or herself from the ambit of customary law[2].
Under Customary law, a woman has no inheritance rights. When her husband dies, she is only entitled to remain in the matrimonial home. Similarly, daughters cannot inherit.  It is the eldest son who has the capacity to inherit the deceased fathers’ property[3]. This law has always been presumed to patriarchal in nature thus favoring men. Such a position presents a problem. Whereas in the case of matrimonial property a woman may have contributed to the acquisition of that property, upon the demise of her husband she is barred form inheritance. This is virtuously prejudicial to women. Such laws however exist despite the existence of Constitutional provisions prohibiting discrimination. Sadly, for a long time, women in Botswana have suffered from secondary status under law.

But all hope is not lost for women. In a landmark ruling, the High Court in Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another, held that the customary laws denying women their right to inheritance are unconstitutional. In his ruling, Judge Key Dingake emphasized that discrimination cannot be justified under any grounds, not even under cultural grounds. In the now oft quoted statement by the judge, he mentioned that “… the time has now arisen for the justices of this court to assume the role of the judicial midwife and assist in the birth of a new world struggling to be born.”[4] In its effect, any law that bars women from inheriting property is repugnant to the notions of justice and equality. Thus such laws should not be followed. 
The Mmusi case challenged a Ngwakeste customary law allowing the youngest son to inherit the family home. The petitioners in this case were three sisters who had lived in the family home and improved it. They claimed to be the rightful owners and consequently demanded their right to inheritance. But based on the discriminatory inheritance laws, their nephew contested the claim.  His challenge was founded on the fact that he was the only surviving male relative, thus the legal owner of the family home. Nonetheless, the challenge was defeated by the court which ruled in favour of the three women.
The courts’ ruling marks a watershed in the recognition of women’s rights. It has been welcomed by several advocacy groups. Priti Patel from the Southern Africa Litigation Centre stated that “[the ruling was a] significant step forward for women's rights not only in Botswana but in the southern Africa region”[5]. She further remarked that “the days of women suffering from secondary status under the law in Botswana are drawing to an end.”[6] Importantly, this ruling addresses the plight of women and should be a stepping stone for larger progress in fostering a culture of gender equality. As a consequence, governments should aim at endorsing laws that promote and protect the rights of all citizens irrespective of their sex.


By Brenda Mwale

[1] Definition according to Black’s Law Dictionary,5th Edition
[2] See Women’s Inheritance Rights in Africa: The Need to Integrate Cultural Understanding and Legal Reform
by Abby Morrow Richardson. Available at http://www.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief/11/2richardson.pdf (accessed on 20/10/2012)
[3] Human Rights Watch Africa, Botswana Second Class Citizens: Discrimination Against Women  Under Botswana's Citizenship Act(1994)  . Available at
[4] Statement according to AFP news agency. Cited in http://africajournalismtheworld.com/2012/10/12/botswana-court-gives-inheritance-rights-to-women/ (accessed on 20/10/2012)

Friday, 8 June 2012

Violation of Women’s Rights in the Military


Nowadays women are becoming more and more powerful in different aspects of life and there is no reason for a woman to be turned away from the military as well. Hundreds and thousands of women are putting their lives on the line fighting for the freedom and security of their countries and it is now clear that women should have an equal chance to compete for any position in the armed forces. Women deserve to be able to serve their country, just as much as men are. They are capable of the type of split-second decisions that military jobs can require and are just as able to perform physically as men can.

But what does it tell us that female soldiers deployed overseas stop drinking water after 7 p.m. to reduce the odds of being raped if they have to use the bathroom at night? Or that a soldier who was assaulted when she went out for a cigarette was afraid to report it for fear she would be demoted - for having gone out without her weapon? Or that, as Representative Jane Harman puts it, "a female soldier in Iraq is more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire."

The Pentagon's figures show that nearly 3,000 women were sexually assaulted in fiscal year 2008, up 9% from the year before; among women serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, the number rose 25%. When you look at the entire universe of female veterans, close to a third say they were victims of rape or assault while they were serving - twice the rate in the civilian population. The problem is even worse than that. The Pentagon estimates that 80% to 90% of sexual assaults go unreported, and it's no wonder. Anonymity is all but impossible; a Government Accountability Office report concluded that most victims stay silent because of "the belief that nothing would be done; fear of ostracism, harassment, or ridicule; and concern that peers would gossip."

But what happens when these women do report the sexual abuse?


„As a child I'd always wanted to serve my country, so joining the U.S. Coast Guard was a dream come true, I loved the discipline, the camaraderie and helping others.”, - says Kori Cioca. „There was just one problem - my supervisor. From the moment I came under his charge, he singled me out for abuse and harassment.  My appeals to his superiors fell on deaf ears, and one night he entered my room, hit me so hard he dislocated my jaw, and then raped me. When I stumbled out from my bunkroom to report the incident, I was told by my commander (a close friend of my assailant) that I was a liar and a "disrespectful non-rate."  Five years since the incident, I am no longer in the coast guard and my jaw still has not received surgery, while my assailant continues to enjoy a successful military career”.

The real horror though is that this woman’s story is not unique. She is one of hundreds of thousands of women who've been raped by fellow soldiers while serving their country and then disbelieved and exiled. All too often, they are punished for reporting, and eventually, despite laudable careers, discharged.

Stephanie Schroeder joined the U.S. Marine Corps not long after 9/11. She was a 21-year-old with an associate's degree when she reported for boot camp at Parris Island, South Carolina.
"I felt like it was the right thing to do," Schroeder recalls. A year and a half later, the Marines diagnosed her with a personality disorder and deemed her psychologically unfit for the Corps.

Anna Moore enlisted in the Army after 9/11 and planned to make a career of it. Moore was a Patriot missile battery operator in Germany when she was diagnosed with a personality disorder and dismissed.

Jenny McClendon was serving as a sonar operator on a Navy destroyer when she received her personality disorder diagnosis.

These women joined different branches of the military but they share a common experience:
each received the psychiatric diagnosis and military discharge after reporting a sexual assault.
CNN has interviewed women in all branches of the armed forces, including the Coast Guard, who tell stories that follow a similar pattern - a sexual assault, a command dismissive of the allegations and a psychiatric discharge.

The edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, known as the DSM-IV, defines a personality disorder as a long-standing, inflexible pattern of maladaptive behavior and coping, beginning in adolescence or early adulthood. That would mean women like Schroeder, Moore and McClendon had a pre-existing personality disorder when they joined the military. Someone with personality disorder tends to get fired from jobs, get in trouble with the law or at school or is unable to maintain relationships. These women have clearly been able to function. They've made it through basic training. They've made it through all the follow-on training. Many of them are deployed overseas in war, and they've done fine there. But, when they're sexually assaulted, and then report it, it seems very suspicious that the military would suddenly stamp them with a pre-existing condition that bars them from serving anymore.

Unlike the civilian world where rape victims can turn to an impartial police force and justice system for help, in the military, rape victims can only appeal to their command - a move that is all too often met with foot-dragging at best, and harsh reprisals at worse. As a result, only eight percent of military sexual assault cases are prosecuted, and far less result in significant prison time.  The governments mustn’t ignore these cases, as the number of sexual assaults in the military is unacceptable. The women in uniform put their lives on the line every day to keep their countries safe. We have a moral duty to keep them safe from those who would attack their dignity and their honor. All the possible actions should be taken to protect the women’s rights in the military – one of the places, where these rights are most likely to be violated.


Sources: CNN, Times Magazine US, change.org

By Natalia Alekseyeva