Showing posts with label Zimbabwe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zimbabwe. Show all posts

Friday, 9 November 2012

[headlines] Zimbabwe: Police raid threatens broader crackdown

Drop Charges Against Staff of Torture Victims’ Center
(Johannesburg) November 9, 2012 – The Zimbabwe government’s raid on a civil society group raises fears of a broader crackdown on perceived opposition activists ahead of elections due in 2013, Human Rights Watch said today.

On November 5, 2012, a dozen uniformed and plain-clothes police officers with a search warrant raided the Harare office of the Counseling Services Unit (CSU), which provides medical and psychological care for victims of political violence and torture. Before they entered, armed riot police surrounded the office and threatened to fire tear gas into the building, which contained other tenants. The police arrested five of the group’s employees and confiscated confidential medical records, including by removing a computer.

“The police raid on a torture victims’ center sends a chilling message to Zimbabwean civil society ahead of next year’s elections,” said Daniel Bekele, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “If a medical group is at risk, then everyone is.”

Patients at the office at the time were unable to receive treatment.

The warrant produced by the police indicated a search for material that “defaces any house, building, wall, fence, lamppost, gate, elevator without the consent of the owner or occupier thereof,” in violation of section 46 of the criminal code.

Two of the arrested employees, James Zidzimu and Penn Bruno, were taken to Harare Central Police Station and soon released. On November 7, the remaining three, Fidelis Mudimu, Zachariah Godi, and Tafadzwa Gesa, were transferred to Bulawayo Police Station and the following day charged under section 46. A magistrate granted them US$100 bail each and ordered them to surrender their passports and to report once a week at Harare Central Police Station.

State security forces aligned with the former ruling party ZANU-PF have conducted many raids in the past year against nongovernmental organizations, including CSU, the counseling service. Several human rights activists have been arrested in the process.

In August, police twice raided the offices of the Gays and Lesbians of Zimbabwe. During a raid on August 11, police briefly detained 44 members of the group, assaulting them with batons, slaps and punches.

Police have also repeatedly harassed Abel Chikomo, director of the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum. Chikomo was arrested and released on bail in 2011 after being charged with running an unregistered organization. He was summoned to stand trial on July 3, 2012. The government withdrew the summons on July 25 but reiterated its intention to summon him again at a future date. Despite the withdrawal of the summons, police have continued to visit the offices of the NGO Forum and harass Chikomo.

Zimbabwe is due to hold a referendum on a new constitution and elections in 2013. The Global Political Agreement that established the current power-sharing government in 2009 requires Zimbabwe to undertake a series of legislative and other reforms before it holds new elections. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) appointed the government of South Africa to help facilitate the constitutional process and pave the way for the elections.

Human Rights Watch has repeatedly expressed concern at the slow pace of human rights reforms in Zimbabwe, including only minimal changes to repressive laws, a lack of security sector reform, and ongoing repression of civic and political activity.

“Civil society organizations are a crucial component of next year’s elections in Zimbabwe,” Bekele said. “African governments involved in the reform effort need to strongly condemn government actions against these important groups.”
Human Rights Watch Press release

Friday, 13 January 2012

Used Goods?


“I am told we are now even importing women’s underwear in this country. How does that happen? If you are a husband and you see your wife buying underwear from the flea market, you would have failed,”
“If I was your in-law, I would take my daughter and urge you to first put your house in order if you still want her back.”
~Tendai Biti, Minister of Finance Zimbabwe

Effective on December 30th, Zimbabweans are not allowed to import “articles of second-hand undergarments of any type, form or description, whether purchased, donated or procured in any other manner.”  Zimbabwe is not the first to ban the importation and sale of second-hand underwear; Tanzania's government likewise banned the practice in 2003, and Ghana did it as early as 1994.  

While reading through the news, two questions bothered me: 1) should the issue of underwear become a public policy issue? 2) Should women wear other women’s underwear?
Sourced from www.myishlist.blogspot.com

Some argue that the ban on used underwear was the right thing to do. “Wearing used underwear is most dehumanising and no government worth its salt should allow its citizens to be abused to this extent. It is a fact that our flea markets receive bales of clothing, some of which is exclusively used underwear – some of which is soiled” (NewsDay).

Human rights lawyer, Nyaradzayi Gumbonzvanda, argues that “in our culture and social life, underpants are the single piece of cloth that is associated with protecting the dignity of womanhood or manhood. Now, that cloth is a subject of public discussion because of poverty, extreme poverty, and some misplaced policy priorities.”  

Though it sounded odd and somewhat embarrassing coming from a man, and because our underwear has become a public discussion, Biti was right to stop the import of used underwear, and I hope other African countries will follow suit.  

Women’s activists should stop being emotional and be honest with ourselves for a moment, asking ourselves this question: Are we so poor that we have to import stained underwear from foreigners? 

Culture evolves with time; back in the 90’s, we never discussed things like underwear in public but it is time to break the silence, most especially when it affects the health of our women.

Contrary to Nyaradzayi Gumbonzvanda’s comments, there is nothing dignifying about wearing another woman’s used underwear, also there are health implications one has to consider.
Sourced from www.secmeme.com

A microbiologist says used garments can harbor dangerous germs and diseases that can survive on fabric for weeks. He claims, “Fecal material would be the most concerning substances. You could have bacteria viruses, fungi. These are things that one person would be able to transfer to another inadvertently through the garment.”

So what could we do to fix the problem?
There is no simple solution to this issue. However, if we want to make a positive change, we must encourage the production and patronage of local underwear factories, and offer feminine hygiene education to our women. It is important that both of these options are made accessible to all people, especially those who are most in need.










By Elsie Reed