I might come across as being insufferably
feminist in my perspective when I say that women are easily the buffer in every
activity – be it war, politics, economics or society itself. But I’ll stick to
my guns, even at the risk of being labelled a jingoistic activist. Why? Because
it’s true, that women are indeed pawns in the hand of any authority that is
hoping to take an authoritative decision, or emerge the authority in some
sphere. Any war front could easily show you that by breaking women, the society
is stripped bare of any semblance of normalcy. So women become easy and soft
targets in war – sexual violence, rape, domestic violence and social
stigmatization mark only the beginning of the story. Take a political battle –
say, for instance, the campaign in the run up to the United States’ elections –
Barack Obama and Mitt Romney cannot stop mudslinging at each other in line with
the other waging a “war on women” of sorts, in America, conspicuously
forgetting the war that’s being waged against Women in Afghanistan by the
Taliban.
But a caveat, before I proceed. My claim is
not that every woman is a toy in the hands of every man. My claim is not that
men are brutes and women are victims. My claim is not that women are
defenceless, weak and incapable of anything but being victimized. I am fully
aware and denounce the scores of women who indulge in exploitation of a legal
provision just to get the better of men. I am fully aware and disregard scores
of women narcissistic personalities that are so enamoured by their status as
women that they misuse the whole “victim” status. I am fully aware and abhor
the malpractice of women who are already empowered indulging in making
ridiculous demands by laying claims that their rights were never ensured. So my
point, therefore, is not for the 100 women who do, and can speak for
themselves, but for the few that do speak for themselves but are deliberately
not heard.
The DR Congo’s girl is a victim of sexual
assault, stigmatization and relentless war, and is pockmarked with stigma for
life. Afghanistan’s girl sits in hope for a better future as threats of
prostitution, domestic violence and a deprivation of basic rights such as
education hold her tightly bound as if in a leash. India’s girl struggles to
stay alive at birth, where there are possibilities that she might be born into
families that only too glad to bump her off the cliff in her foetal stage, or
throw her in a bin after she is born, because she is a girl. Nigeria’s girl
struggles under the yoke of sexual slavery and sexual abuse. Somalia’s girl
bleeds from the heart under the yoke of FGM. Houston’s girls lie in fear lest
they be the subject of trafficking. Saudi Arabia’s girl sits inside a cage of
black, enslaved, entrapped and excluded.
Why is it so easy to wage war against a
woman? Why is it so easily the weapon of choice? Where is the beginning, where
is the end? Or is there an end, at all? For children of today to make a niche
in life as people tomorrow, their mother must be literate, and treated well. A
family where mothers are ill-treated breeds children that might live cowering
in fear, or wind up being bullies. If women are subjected to sexual violence, the
institution of the family is broken, and society is crippled and forced on its
knees. That the entire institution that “society” is comes to a grinding halt
when women are targeted is not a baseless contention because women are the
adhesive for the cohesive subsistence of a family or a society to exist. And
until this realization dawns on the world, it will always be at war against
women.
By Kirthi Gita Jayakumar
No comments:
Post a Comment