By Sabrina Willard
The United States is the
only developed country in the world that doesn’t federally-mandate paid
maternity leave, and this oversight has been linked to a slow, yet steady,
across-the-board decline of women in this country’s workforce. Economists are
attributing the drop to decisions by some post-partum workers to remain at home,
or not begin a career at all, knowing that they might eventually have to take a
significant amount of time off for childrearing. While a woman choosing to stay
at home is by no means a new phenomenon, there is this sense that we are
somehow backpedaling from the victories that laid the foundation for women
entering the workforce during the last several decades.
In a recent New York
Times op-ed piece, Claire Cain Miller points out that “stalled
policy goes a long way toward explaining why women stop working, and new
approaches could help women complete the decades-long transition into the labor
force.” She cited a report published this month by the White House Council of Economic Advisers,
which encourages the government to adopt policies that will foster more female participation
in the workforce. According to the council, over the last decade, European
countries enacted various family-friendly policies like paid leave, subsidized
childcare and support for part-time work, explaining why the US has fallen
behind these countries in female labor force participation.
The theory is that women
will be more likely to go back to work after having children if their employer has
policies in place to support childcare. This idea is supported in studies like the one conducted in California in 2011, the first state to mandate paid parental
leave, by Maya Rossin-Slater and Jane Waldfogel of Columbia University and
Christopher J. Ruhm of the University of Virginia. It not only found that new
mothers were more likely to return to work when they were offered this
incentive, but that they were working more and being paid a higher income one to
three years after heading back to the office.
“When people have paid
leave, it just gives them a path back to work, whereas when they drop out of
the labor force and stop working in order to take a leave with a young child,
they come back slower,” said Betsey Stevenson, a member of the White House Council
of Economic Advisers.
Declining participation
in the workforce doesn’t just cast a shadow on the efforts of women like my
mother who paved the way for us to enter the workforce in historical proportions.
It may have economic implications for the US as well.
In the upfront to a 2013
study, Francine D. Blau and
Lawrence M. Kahn of Cornell University reported that the US had the
sixth-highest female labor participation rate among 22 Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries in 1990, yet its ranking
had fallen to 17th by 2010. Blau and Kahn stated that “the expansion
of ‘family-friendly’ policies, including parental leave and part-time work…
explains 28-29% of the decrease in US women’s labor force participation
relative to these other countries.”
So much in the latter
half of the last century has contributed to women’s success outside of the
home. But, now that we’ve moved past the mere initiation and acceptance of
females in this country’s labor force, it is time to explore how our policies
can better encourage their long-term professional contributions to the economy.
We need all employers to stand united behind family-friendly policies like paid
leave, which has already proven to be beneficial in the individual states and
countries where it has been implemented.
No comments:
Post a Comment